|
RIP Curly
|
May. 16th, 2008 @ 07:01 am
|
|---|
|
January 2006 - May 15th 2008






|
|
Stupid Pet Owners
|
May. 10th, 2008 @ 02:12 pm
|
|---|
|
AKA the "I'm-at-work-on-a-Saturday-and-stupid-people-are-calling-me" rant. I don't mind ignorant pet owners. Ignorant I can deal with. I've been an ignorant pet owner myself. Ignorant means you don't know something and often that you don't even know that you don't know something. Unlike stupidity, it's a curable condition. A smart ignorant person knows to listen to advice from someone more knowledgeable. Here's an example, wildly, just off the top of my head… your dog eats a pesticide you just put down in your yard. You saw the "keep dogs away from area" on the label, and let your dog out there anyway. A few hours later, the dog is vomiting and shaking, and you think "huh, I wonder why" and, on the off chance it might be related, you call the number on the pesticide label and get me. I tell you, um, wow, your dog could totally DIE in the next hour, you need to take him to the vet right away. If your response is, "oh, I guess I'll grab a shower and make an appointment" I'm going to be very, very pissed. It's easy to tell the difference between the ignorant pet owner and the stupid one. In this situation, the response of someone who's simply ignorant is to become immediately concerned and say they'll take their pet in right away. You just called THE EXPERT. I told you to go the vet right away. That means now, as in emergency treatment, not after your shower, not at an appointed time. Now. There is no stronger language I can use than "death" or "fatal", the only explanation for your cavalier attitude is that you're a careless and stupid pet owner and shouldn't have responsibility for anything with a brain stem. I once had a lady call in the middle of a hair dressing appointment. She'd left her little dog at home with muscle tremors and severe diarrhea and gee, it's been bothering her, so she'd thought she'd call while she was under the drier. Just to, you know, make sure it wasn't serious. I tell her it IS serious, and the dog needs to go to the vet asap (if your pet is that sick, this should be a no-brainer, whether the cause was a pesticide or not). Her response? "I can't go now, my hair isn't dry!" WTF, people? If this was her son or daughter, child services would be all up in her ass in a heartbeat. Neighbors would intervene, police would take action, newspapers would report about it. But no, it's just a dog. A dog who probably died a horrible, but quiet death alone in the house, the replacement puppy purchased before the dirt on the backyard grave had completely settled.
I've lost count of how many times I've finished a call and said "well, that dog's going to die. Stupid owner strikes again." And it kills me that I can't call them out on it over the phone. That would be an excellent thing to do if I wanted to get fired. Grr, I say.
|
|
I never thought I'd say this...
|
Apr. 21st, 2008 @ 07:19 am
|
|---|
|
PETA is doing something kind of cool: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-fake-meatapr21,1,7351841.story
They announced today that they'll give $1 million to the "first person to come up with a method to produce commercially viable quantities of in vitro meat at competitive prices by 2012."
I personally love the idea of fake meat. I have no problem with eating animals (obviously), but animal protein is expensive to raise, and meeting a growing worldwide demand for it means commercial operations are often cruel to the animals and messy for the environment. I can get around supporting that kind of crap by buying local, happy, pasture-raised, humanely slaughtered animals or hunting it myself, but there's very few people in the world who are in my (rather privileged) position. It would be great if there was an efficient and economical way to grow meat without the inconvenience of silly things like intelligence and pain receptors and waste products.
It's interesting that Newkirk is the driving force behind this. It's such a pragmatic and common-sense move from a lady who is certifiably insane. I also think it's hilarious that she's getting flak from others within the organization because some PETAns find eating any animal protein unacceptable, even if it's raised in a test tube.
$1 million dollars is a pretty dinky prize for advancing a new technology. According to the same article linked above, the Netherlands has already spent $5 million in fake meat research. And a deadline of less than 4 years from now also seems like a joke.
So, it's not terribly well thought-out, and of course it pisses me off that the prize money is coming from PETA, which probably means it was raised through lying to well-meaning pet lovers, but I can't help but admire the move just a little bit. If you're a crazy vegan out to impose your views on the rest of the world, what better way to stop people from eating meat than provide them with a cheaper alternative? Violence just hasn't been working for them, and they've been caught out in many of their lies http://www.petakillsanimals.com/ ; maybe they're finally coming to their senses and trying a different, more practical, (and ethical), tactic.
|
|
|
Apr. 6th, 2008 @ 09:45 am
|
|---|
|
a) Yesterday we went to visit a friend in Eugene and ended up playing with her LARP group. For four hours. We went on a Quest. I killed a goblin. I... I think I'm hooked. God help me.
b) I would like someone to call up my subconscious and ask it where this came from: I had a dream last night that I was the guardian spirit of a Mayan child and was watching over him as he and his best friend played in a cenote. He left for a few minutes in search of a pretty rock to give her, and while he was gone she fell in the water and drown. I knew it was going to happen, but could do nothing but watch.
|
|
Western Oregon gets confused about the season... again
|
Mar. 27th, 2008 @ 09:07 am
|
|---|
|
On my to-do list for today:
- Mow the lawn - Transplant the cilantro and basil - finish getting the beds ready for spring planting
...because, you know, it's going to be April in a few days and it's time to do spring things.
But I can't. Because it's freaking snowing.
|
|
|
Mar. 26th, 2008 @ 12:50 pm
|
|---|
|
Last night I had a dream I was running around the numerous secret passages of a large hotel/office building, evading the Bad Guys while trying to foil their Plans.
I guess it's what I get for watching that special about Portland's underground right before bed.
|
|
D.C.: Land of Acronyms
|
Mar. 23rd, 2008 @ 07:14 am
|
|---|
|

Once every other year, my place of employment empties its travel budget and sends a bunch of people to Washington DC to visit with EPA for a week. This year, since I'm 'senior' staff, I was one of the privileged specialists who got to join the bosses on the trip. My job was easy; sit around and look pretty and answer the occasional question about how I do my job. My bosses job was to give a lot of presentations, shake a lot of hands, and make sure EPA is happy with the job their grantees are doing waaaay over there in the wilds of the West Coast.
While we spent most of the time in meetings (oh god, endless, endless meetings.... and did I mention acronyms? In one short memo, I counted 13), we did get most of one day to do a bit of touristy stuff around the National Mall. It was nice, I haven't been here since I was 13 or so. I didn't get a chance to check out any museums, but I'll probably be back some day with Tom.
I want to say something about it, before moving on to the photos. Every joke you've ever made about the government, well, I got to experience it first hand, and for EPA at least, it's all true. It's top-heavy, there are problems with communication, there is money wasted, and low efficiency and many of the top-level managers are clueless bean counters with broken irony meters. But. There are also good, hardworking people there. People who care, and are doing their best to protect the public and the environment from potentially harmful chemicals. I just wanted to put that out there, because the EPA often gets a bad rap. Lord knows, it's often deserved. But try to keep in mind that it's a huge agency, and there are a large number of people in it who aren't in bed with industry and are honestly trying their best.
|
|
|
Mar. 16th, 2008 @ 10:11 am
|
|---|
|
Mmmm.... maki rolls for breakfast. |
|
In which Suzanne imitates a movie reviewer
|
Mar. 13th, 2008 @ 11:19 am
|
|---|
|
So, for our birthdays, Tom and I went to see 10,000 BC. My personal favorite period in natural and human history is 40,000-2,000 BC, so I probably know more about that period than your average movie goer. I just wanna say that I did not have high expectations for this movie; I went into it expecting more shiny than substance, especially considering the director.
|
|
Lunar eclipse
|
Feb. 20th, 2008 @ 09:45 pm
|
|---|
|

Taken at 7:43pm. Whoo hoo!
|
|
more broken stereotypes
|
Feb. 15th, 2008 @ 03:06 pm
|
|---|
|
Pets Getting a Raw Deal
|
Feb. 9th, 2008 @ 10:44 am
|
|---|
|
If there's one school of thought in that can make me twitch like an epileptic rattlesnake, it's the one that goes: "Wild = Natural = Better!"
Several of the blogs I read were talking about “raw meat pet diets” the other day. I didn’t know much about it but I seem to be running into it everywhere lately: forums, Craigslist, even flyers outside the pet store. So I went a’googlin’. And what I found made me want to rant. So here I am.
The reasoning for feeding raw food can be summed up thusly: “Dogs descend from wolves. In the wild, wolves eat mostly raw meat and appear to be perfectly healthy. Therefore, dogs should eat a raw meat diet.”
Ok, sure. Here are some other "natural" conditions for wild canines: parasites, bacterial and fungal infections, ingrown nails, exposure and frostbite, uncontrolled disease, dehydration, mineral deficiencies, and high pup mortality. “Natural” =\= Healthier.
|
|
|